11 Jan 2023, 13:19
Smi365 wrote:
Deucalion wrote:
Smi365 wrote:
Took the opportunity based on the reviews
90% on what was said is true.
10% was the uneasiness of a new encounter.
So possibly, things might get to that 99.9% level on next visit..
She definitely tries to provide top notch WG service.
Area, and within the property, very safe. It was like this is our safe haven.
So there you have it. Next
edited by Smi365 on 1/10/2023
edited by Smi365 on 1/10/2023
I reviewed myself into another visit and I stand by my original review.
Please enlighten me on the 10% I was incorrect on?
Thanks Deucalion, for question on 10% drop from your 100% review
[ul][li]There was a bit of time watching going on, whilst I was enjoying the moment[/li][li]Having a smart watch on wrist. This should be removed[/li][li]When it lights up, eyes turned to look at it[/li][li]Also as mentioned, it was our first meeting, hence uneasiness[/li][/ul]
90% is still a very high score, compared to the matric pass rate of 33.3% in South Africa
Thanks Again
No problem.
I am glad you could benefit from my review.
90% is an excellent score and that's what I would rate her too, maybe 92.5%.
That said, in my mind 100% does not exist and if it did, I would not be here nor out hunting.
If there was any clockwatching during my sessions, I may have been too busy to notice.